I must said it's pretty interesting and this has stimulated me into giving much thought on the creationism versus evolution theory.
I don't support either side and in fact I have worked up some arguments supporting or rebutting both theories. Most of the time I throw my ideas at my brother to see if he would have anything to add or to refute my ideas, because I can be quite unsure if some of my thoughts on it are right, or perhaps there could be some fallacy to the logic which I have applied for the arguments.
Well I think perhaps I'm a bit too inquisitive especially during holidays when I'm bored and have nothing better to do then think of such things to occupy my mind. I don't know if I am wasting my time thinking of such things, but isn't that why God gave us brains, or perhaps we have been evolved into having a brain to think for ourselves and to think and question things happening around us? Somebody told me not to waste my time thinking about things which I cannot change, or perhaps would not even affect me and instead spend my time studying. Which is also probably true. Oh well, when term starts I shall go back to my studying.
For one, we certainly can't deny that evolution does exist, as it's been proven by science, but sometimes cannot come out of nothing. There must be somebody which created it.
Which might probably bring us back to the age old argument of did the chicken or egg come first?
or perhaps;
If God created the earth and everything in it, then who created God, as something cannot come out of nothing?
I am kinda freaked out by the idea of evolution, as humans aka homo sapiens might one day evolve into some other species, and I wonder what sort of weird species would it be which would be far superior to us. It just completely scares me.
By the way, I have discovered the book The origin of the species by Charles Darwin online. I wonder if I should download it and read it?
http://www.literature.org/authors/darwin-charles/the-origin-of-species-6th-edition/
Oh yeah, there's this other argument about truth, but I'm not going to elaborate very much on it either. There's too many ways of looking at it, and you could argue it from a philosophical point of view or perhaps from a logical sense, etc.
Firstly, we need to ask ourself what is truth?
Well I've checked the dictionary and it's come up with this:
1. | the true or actual state of a matter. |
2. | conformity with fact or reality; verity: the truth of a statement. |
3. | a verified or indisputable fact, proposition, principle, or the like: mathematical truths. |
4. | the state or character of being true. |
5. | actuality or actual existence. |
I would like to know if truth is relative?
For example, there was a car accident, and there are 2 witnesses A and B.
A saw that the red car knocked into the blue car.
Whereas B saw the blue car knocked into the red car.
So which one of the above is the truth then?
Is the truth just relative from each person's point of view of what they believe in or what they saw happened?
I might be giving a poor example, but I hope you would be able to see my point.
But to argue that what a person believes to be the truth should be the truth, this argument cannot withstand because if a person believes the world is flat.
Is the world flat then?
Of course it isn't!
What else? I think I'm going to stop here.
The Aristotelian definition of truth states:
"To say of something which is that it is not, or to say of something which is not that it is, is false. However, to say of something which is that it is, or of something which is not that it is not, is true."
Confusing enough?The problem with questions is that it just leads to more questions. So should I then stop questioning so much, as it's all pointless arguments anyway?